What is Parliamentary Debate?
Parliamentary (Parli) debate is a British style debate that is gaining popularity worldwide. So much so that it has been adopted as the official style of the high school level World School Debate Championship (WSDC), college level World Universities Debating Championship, and the European Universities Debating Championship. In fact, the U.S. National Speech & Debate Association (NSDA) has longtime been partnering with WSDC and hosted 2017 WSDC in the U.S. as below:
Unique benefits to learning Parli & Its Structure
- It forces students’ to have better teamwork as its 1 team consists of a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 6 people.
- It compels students’ to think fast on their feet because at least half of their debate topics are released about 15 minutes before the round.
- It improves students’ impromptu speaking ability because their topic is different each round.
Speeches are usually between five and seven minutes in duration as below:
Prime Minister Constructive (PMC): 7 minutes
Leader of the Opposition Constructive (LOC): 8 minutes
Member of the Government Constructive (MG or MGC): 8 minutes
Member of the Opposition Constructive (MO or MOC): 8 minutes
Leader of Opposition Rebuttal (LOR): 4 minutes
Prime Minister Rebuttal (PMR): 5 minutes
How is British Parli Different from the U.S. PF, LD, Policy Debate?
No Crossfire, but POI: Unlike the U.S. Style debate such as PF, LD, and Policy, there is no designated time for “crossfire” in the Parliamentary debate. Instead, all speakers are expected to interrupt their opponents’ speech with Points of Information(POIs). However, the POIs are usually rejected by saying “no thank you,” except for about 2 times average during the 5-8 minute speech, each POI usually lasting no more than 30 seconds.
Less Stress on Evidence, More about Persuasion: Successful Parli debaters are eloquent and cogent speakers who don’t rely on evidence very much. In fact, they cannot, as their topics (motions) are given to them 15 minutes before a debate round, making it impossible to research in advance. Thus, even for preannounced motions, Judges also hardly ever check the debaters’ evidence for credibility.
Speech Style is #1 Voting Issue: Judges are trained to award more points for speech style – i.e., fluency, volume, organization, and even humor – as opposed to argumentation. This doesn’t mean argumentation is not important, as it is also an important voting issue for Parli. However, compared to the U.S. style debate, there is less emphasis on evidence and research.
ADL’s First Success with Parli at 2017 NSDA – WSD Invitational
Coached by Julian Gagnon, ADL’s first WSD team participated in 2017 WSD Invitational hosted by NSDA, and ranked the top international team with a record of 3:3. In fact, this was the best ever record for Taiwan WSD team, as prior teams’ best record was never higher than 2:4 in the world stage. Team members (Brandon Chen, Kelly Phil, Gene Chou, Eliot Wang) qualified by winning in PF event in 2017 NSDA Taiwan District Tournament.
2017 WSD – NSDA Motions (as an example)
Round 1: This House regrets the rise of alternative media.
Round 2: This House supports compulsory climate science education in secondary schools.
Round 3: Impromptu Motion
Round 4: This House would increase sanctions on Russia.
Round 5: Impromptu Motion
Round 6: Impromptu Motion
Double Octafinals: This House believes that the commercialization of feminism has been detrimental to the movement.
Octafinals: Impromptu Motion
Quarterfinals: Impromptu Motion
Semifinals: Impromptu Motion
Finals: This House regrets the rise of global populism.
Historical information about WSDC – the Parli format
The U.S. has almost 100 years of debate history. It started with policy debate, then about 35 years ago (1981), LD debate was introduced to NSDA to make it easier, then about 15 years ago (2002), PF debate was introduced to NSDA to make it even easier for beginners.
Now, about 5 years ago (2013), US NSDA has introduced the British style WSD (Parli) to make it even more accessible for kids who didn’t make it to Policy, LD, or PF. In the US NSDA, kids who don’t make it to the traditional US style debate, eagerly applies for WSD, as this debate is new, so more space, and even allows more people in one team – up to 5 kids can be in one team. This also means tournament organizers make more money because US debate can only house 2 – 4 students per 1 judge in 1 room, but Parli can house 10 students per 1 judge in 1 room.
For all these reasons, now Parli has been chosen to be the format for the world stage debates because for foreigners who have not been trained in the US style debate find the Parli format easier to learn, as it requires less research and has no crossfire, so more accessible for the world audience and doable for the non-expert debate judges they hire to do their jobs.
Usually in the US NSDA WSD, half of their topics are pre-announced, so does require some research, but their goal is to produce competent and cogent speakers rather than heavy researchers and philosophers like US style debate.
If you love speech more than the technical debate strategies, then Parli is a perfect style for you, as it is more of an impromptu speech competition because judges are trained to focus more on debaters’ speech style than their evidence.
However, while the format is easier, for students who cannot think quickly on their own feet, Parli is actually more difficult because in this format, the topic is announced only a few minute before each round, and for each round, a new topic is given.
Now, the trend in the world stage parli – WSDC – the US debaters are dominating and winning even in British style debate. Why? US debaters focus more on research and evidence due to their training in PF, LD, and Policy, so their content of debate case is much stronger. In other words, by US debaters’ participation in the WSDC, other opponents have been challenged by the more sophistication US debaters bring to this circuit.
ADL’s Coaches With Successful Parli Debate Experience
Debate, Speech, and Writing Instructor
- Bachelor of Arts Degree in Applied Arts and Sciences Communication &
- Minor Degree in Marketing, San Diego State University
John’s coaching style reflects his personality; energetic, passionate, honest, encouraging, and understanding of his student’s needs. While studying communication and marketing at San Diego State University, John was introduced to the world of debate. Taking courses in Argumentation and Persuasion, he joined the parliamentary debate team where he competed on the SDSU squad for two years. His competitive nature led him to pursue an opportunity to work in Beijing, China, coaching high school students in the art of speech and debate. Contracted to various high schools, John is experienced in coaching national champions and beginners alike. The result of his tenure in Beijing yielded twoNSDA China championshipsin Public Forum (PF) debate, with several regional championships in PF, as well as Original Oratory (OO). Outside of debate, John satisfies his competitive spirit through chess, basketball, tennis, football, and soccer. In his spare time John also participates in improvisational comedy, which contributes to a class atmosphere of fun and engagement, while still teaching the foundations and strategies needed to be successful as a debater.
- University of North Texas – Interdisciplinary Studies Major
- (Focus Areas: Sociology, Communications and Political Science)
Mike Girouard started debating in High School where he qualified for the State tournament and was a participant in elimination rounds at most every tournament he attended. While in college Mike qualified for the NDT and reached elimination rounds at most Policy College Tournaments. He also competed in and qualified for elimination rounds for Texas Undergraduate Moot Court Association State Tournament and was awarded Top Speaker Honors. Mike was also one of the top US teams to compete at The Worlds Universities Debating Championship. He has coached at the High School Level at Highland Park High School (TX), Connally High School (TX), and Coppell High School (TX). During this time he qualified numerous teams into the elimination rounds as well as top speaking awards. Mike has also coached at the collegiate level for the University of Rochester (NY), Kansas State University (KS), Baylor University (TX), The New School University (NY) and most recently at Augustana College (IL). While coaching in college he coached teams to elimination rounds and speaker awards at nearly every tournament and qualified teams to compete at the National Debate Tournament. Mike has a love for all forms of debate and experience teaching and coaching several forms of Individual Events.
Asian Debate League is the Exclusive Agent in Taiwan of the following coaches. Please contact ADL if you are interested in taking their classes.
Julian Vincent Gagnon
- University of North Texas – Social Sciences Major
- (Emphasis on Philosophy, Psychology, and Political Science; Peace Studies Minor)
Julian Gagnon was a champion debater in high school and college. Originally from Florida, Julian was a TOC policy debater before accepting a scholarship to debate at UNT. At UNT he reached the elimination rounds at most national tournaments and participated in the Kentucky Round Robin. Having coached for Highland Park (TX), Grapevine (TX), and college programs including Augustana, and University of North Texas, Julian has worked with numerous award-winning debaters, and has coached in late elimination rounds of virtually every major national-circuit event in the country, including the Tournament of Champions, National Junior Forensics league, and the National Debate Tournament. He was part of a coaching staff that produced the top college debater at the National Debate Tournament. His team was the focus of the 2007 documentary film Resolved, and he is considered one of the brightest young argument coaches in the U.S. Julian is a co-owner ofpfdebate.com and a researcher for various institutes.
ADL Parli Class Time is Saturdays 4:45 – 6:45 PM.
- Learn to question premises.
- Learn to deduce from logical reasoning.
- Learn to infer from examples.
- Learn to refute seemingly true statements.
- Learn to theorize with logic.
- Learn in depth about the given topic.
- Learn to research and cut evidence.
- Learn to write coherent Pro & Opo cases.
- Learn to argue in a persuasive manner.
- Learn to work in teams and win/lose with grace.
- Learn to time manage with focus on team research allocation.
- Learn to overcome fears and become confident in speaking and debating in English.
- Age Appropriateness: 7th grade and up
- Program Duration: all year long
- Class Duration & Frequency: 2 hours, once a week
- Tuition: NT$ 25,200 for 18 weeks
- Payment Policy:
- Pay in advance
- Pay Cash
- No refund